* This website participates in the Amazon Affiliate Program and earns from qualifying purchases.
Are you a fan of gripping thrillers mixed with unexpected comedy? If so, you might be tempted to watch "Flight Risk," the latest movie starring Mark Wahlberg and directed by Mel Gibson. However, before you grab your popcorn, let’s discuss whether this film is a worthy addition to your must-see list or simply a flight you should avoid.
In the world of cinema, a film’s debut often hints at its quality. January has become notorious for cinematic flops, a dumping ground for movies that studios are hesitant to showcase. "Flight Risk" appears to follow this trend closely. With an intriguing premise involving a U.S. Marshal, a fugitive, and a deranged pilot, you might expect thrills and tension. Unfortunately, this film fails to deliver on these fronts.
The basic setup involves Michelle Dockery playing a federal agent responsible for transporting fugitive Topher Grace’s character to Anchorage to testify against the mob, with Wahlberg’s questionable pilot as their only means of transport. Sounds promising? As it turns out, this film presents itself as a jumbled mess with tonal inconsistencies that leave viewers confused and frustrated.
First, let’s dive into the characters. Dockery’s portrayal of a serious and intense agent seems to clash with Grace's attempt at turning the situation into a comedic escapade. Meanwhile, Wahlberg goes for a dangerously charismatic character who fuses threats with uncomfortable humor. This disjointed character dynamic results in a lack of coherence, making it difficult to engage with any character on a meaningful level.
As far as the plot goes, one might envision a cat-and-mouse chase full of suspense and unexpected twists. Instead, we are presented with a flabby script littered with awkward dialogue and juvenile humor. Lines feel forced and desperate, with attempts at humor falling flat amidst the backdrop of violence and tension. A standout bizarre moment is the main character's reference to having a "Museum of Modern Art in my pants" during a precarious flying sequence—truly a low when juxtaposed with the stakes at hand.
How about the direction? Mel Gibson’s return to the director's chair has been met with mixed reactions. His visual intensity beautifully contrasts the claustrophobic interior of the cargo aircraft with stunning shots of snow-capped Alaskan vistas. Yet, despite the dynamic camera work, this film still comes across as a poorly crafted project that lacks the finesse one would expect from a director of Gibson's caliber.
One of the most confusing elements of "Flight Risk" is the tonal shifts throughout the film. It oscillates between being a dark thriller and a light-hearted comedy, leading to scenes that leave audiences bewildered rather than amused. The film even attempts to incorporate a conspiracy at a governmental level, which could have added depth, but instead feels like an afterthought shoehorned into the already tumultuous narrative.
In conclusion, while "Flight Risk" might entice with its star-studded cast and an engaging premise, it ultimately fails to take flight, crashing instead into the realm of forgettable January releases. As the credits roll, viewers are left wondering whether they’d have been better off catching a different flick. Save your time and money for a film that truly deserves it.
So, should you book a seat for "Flight Risk" when it hits theaters? The overwhelming consensus is a resounding no. Instead, consider scrolling through your favorite streaming services for something that will genuinely captivate you.
* This website participates in the Amazon Affiliate Program and earns from qualifying purchases.